Obama's father a Foreigner - Automatically disqualifies Obama for Office

The Bottom Line on Natural Born Citizen:

https://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22262



Even if Obama was born in the USA, his father was not and that automatically makes him ineligible. He is a fraud and if we do not uphold the Constitutional law on this point, then the whole law of the land is also worthless.


Both parents must be citizen of the the country for the child to be a Natural Born Citizen. It's the LAW.


Read the article in the press (above link).


This affects us all, regardless of whether you are a Democrat, Republican, or Independent. This is a US American issue of the highest order!

What does Obama's dad being Kenyan have to do with his presidency? He was born in the USA, to an American mother, he is an American citizen and he was elected by the American people to be president of the United States of America.

Or this legal definition:

https://thelibertypole.ning.com/forum/topics/the-definition-of-natural-born


In one crucial matter, the framers of the Constitution DID consider that 'natural law' was important to the safety and security of the United States of America and that is why they specifically incorporated the term 'natural born citizen' into the Constitution (in Section II, Article I, Clause 5), - for the specific purpose of ensuring that the Commander-in-Chief of American armed forces had indisputable loyalty to the United States. Indeed this was so important to the framers of The Constitution, that they made it a REQUIREMENT that anyone born after 1787 MUST be a 'natural born citizen' of the USA in order to serve as President or Vice President of the United States. They weren't just making provisions for the particular circumstances of their own time, they were setting this principle in Constitutional stone to protect the integrity of the United States for all time.

This is a classic case of 'the exception proving the rule'. The rule is that 'The Constitution' is the supreme law of the USA. No other law, be it natural law or British statute law or common law or any other type of law can outweigh American Constitutional law. However the matter of the danger of an American President or Vice President having any allegiance to a foreign power was so important to the framers of 'The Constitution that they SPECIFICALLY incorporated this single EXCEPTIONAL item of 'natural law' into 'The Constitution'. By codifying the 'natural born citizen' clause into 'The Constitution', the framers converted this single aspect of 'natural law' into Constitutional law. They made it part of 'The Constitution', so it must be the supreme law of the USA. The fact that the framers lifted the 'natural born citizen' concept from the principles of 'natural law' is irrelevant. The indisputable fact is that the framers, in their wisdom, chose to include the 'natural born citizen' clause in 'The Constitution' and no-one has subsequently been able to remove it.

What did the framers mean by the term 'natural born citizen'? There was only one definition of 'natural born citizen', at the time of the framing of The Constitution of the United States - "BORN IN THE COUNTRY OF PARENTS WHO ARE CITIZENS" (as in Vattel's 'Law of Nations'). It would have been superfluous for the framers to expand on the term. Everyone knew what it meant.

In the case of Mr Barack Obama II, the 1948 British Nationality Act, merely states the effect, in British law, of the FACT that Mr Barack Obama II is not a 'natural born citizen' of the United States, but is instead, the son of a man, Barack Obama I, who was born in British East Africa, in the country now known as Kenya. It is ironic that despite the fact that Barack Obama II, was born as a British subject, under the 1948 Act, it is the Kenyan soil and culture of his natural Father that divides his loyalties from the US (as well as the Indonesian soil and culture of his adoptive Father, Lolo Soetoro).

Barack Obama II and his active and tacit supporters have thrown down the gauntlet to the American people. "We can ignore The Constitution of the United States, whenever it suits us". The American people that defeated Naziism and Communism must now pick up the gauntlet and face this challenge, which threatens to destroy The American Constitution - the bedrock of the greatest nation in the history of the world.

Under the law, anyone born on US soil, even if neither parents are US citizens, is a US citizen by birthright.

I believe the Indonesian school thing is a red herring, because he has represented himself as being born in Hawaii, and that is where questions about his birth must be answered.

What he (they) have presented is certified copy of his birth certificate generated during his campaign in 2007. That copy has never been made available for an impartial examination, but more importantly, this whole thing could be dismissed in heartbeat if they simply allowed examination of the record on which the copy is based--or produced an original.

Wrong. Why are you not reading the links, or the law?

People born in the US are US Citizens. But in order to be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, requires more. This was intentionally written into the Constitution, for fear that a person's loyalties would lie in another country if both parents were not citizens of the USA.

Obama's dad is NOT a US Citizen. That's just the beginning, but it is enough.

Stop arguing. Read the Law, the links, etc. It's quite simple, and there is nothing to argue about.

What the hell? How many generations of parents must be both born in the US for you to be a natural born citizen?

What kind of a jack a** statement is this?? The requirements are that the man himself must be a natural born citizen. He must be born in the States. He must be at laest 35. He must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years. That's it. People need to stop pulling things out of their butts. If Obama wasn't qualified to be President, he wouldn't be.

For an excellent summation of the legitimate arguments against Obama go here:
https://usurpador.blogcindario.com/2009/12/00402-what-is-putative-president-obama-s-current-u-s-citizenship-status.html

Exactly, if he did not quality, don't you think the republicans would be able to prove it as much of a witch hunt they went on?

Are people still not over this yet?

thats NOT how it reads,
it reads:
only native born, or born abroad having two u.s. citizens
as parents can be eligible to become president..

please reference united states vs wong kim ark (us 649)
1898 where the court states:
"The constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words [citizen and natural born citizen], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

& for the extent this goes to, please find
perkins vs elg
schnieder vs rusk

i dont like obama either, but you need to do your
homework before you just spout s*** as fact

I wish it were true, but it's not. As long as he was born on U.S. soil he's a U.S. citizen.

I wouldn't say that. If he didn't meet the requirements he wouldn't be President. Being qualified, however, is a matter of opinion.

yes, yes. what she said. you all know what i meant.