The Forum Site - Join the conversation
Forums:
Politics

Obama going after your 401k’s and IRA’s

Reply to Topic
AuthorMessage
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 · >>
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#16New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:35:28
I did find this:

https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/cmt-1210-AB32.html#.ULPdg4cdwmk

This isn't about this exact topic, but it's all I could find of Rebecca Davis commenting to this department. She wasn't a part of this hearing, she was just a member of the public who was present who was made a response after the hearing. She did so in April of 2011. She was just one of 114 members of the public to make some post-hearing comments.

It was not testimony. She was not a part of the actual hearing itself in any way; she was not sworn in, and she did not testify. The Pension Rights Center did offer a written commentary as a member of the public on the proposed rule in February 2011, but she was not a part of that commentary.

I did also find this:
https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/1210-AB33hearingagenda.pdf

She was scheduled to be one of 23 people scheduled to discuss the issue that particular day in September. 23 people in one day. There were 22 more the next day. I wonder what those 44 people not named Rebecca Davis said? Do you know? Do you care?

Do you think the Obama administration is "planning" to do everything every one of those 44 people said? Probably not, I'd guess.

Oh wait I found her full remarks:
https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/PRC091510.pdf

Turns out she didn't "demand" anything. Here's the full excerpt:

"Therefore, we suggest that serious consideration be given to the concept of establishing a government sponsored program, ideally administered by the PBGC, where participants with low account balances could purchase low-cost annuities."

Here's a link to what the other 33 people who actually gave comments said:
https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/cmt-1210-AB33.html#.ULPgJIcdwml

Are you planning on reading all of them to see what the Obama administration is "planning" to do after all the "demands" they undoubtedly heard?

See, this is what reading and thinking for yourself looks like. It's not reading one bulls*** unsourced article on a bunk bulls*** website. It's getting down to actual facts and reality and using your own brain without some retarded hyper-partisan filter.
El_Tino On October 12, 2023
booyaka!





Albuquerque, New Mexico
#17New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:40:28
@Alkaia Said

Its going to be ugly next year, im actually thinking of removing my funds. and burying them in the yard...


I wish you would, along with every other right winger, that way the other lefties can get better prices when we buy stocks. Feel free to jump back in and drive prices back up when I retire.
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#18New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:43:04
Oh, here's the full transcript from that day:

https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/1210-AB33-09142010.pdf

You will notice Miss Davis' remarks differ from the written response submitted. If you read the remarks she gave in person, she "demanded" nothing.

Here is the complete excerpt of the offending portion where she "demanded" that the Obama administration apparently end all private retirement saving. Read the passage and tell me if that's what you would have concluded reading this on your own without the NSC telling you what to think:


We would support a requirement that all
defined contribution plans offer basic lifetime income
option as an optional form of benefit distribution from the
plan. A basic offering would be a simple annuity base,
transparent and subject to the joint and survivor rules
applicable to defined benefit plans. There should also be
an option for partial annuitization to give participants
greater flexibility and also to calm the nerves of those
who balk at putting all their nest egg in one basket.
Additionally, the mere existence of the benefit option
within the plan carries with it an endorsement effect that
could encourage some wavering participants to opt for an
annuity. Under current 401k plan structure, participants may
withdraw all or part of their savings -- excuse me -- and
purchase an annuity on the private market. Alternatively,
a small number of individual account plans through service
providers, offer participants annuity options. Private
annuities are problematic, primarily because of their high
cost and the negligible monthly benefits that small account
balances can purchase. For these reasons, an annuity
option within a 401k for participants with low balances
would not be a realistic choice for most low and moderate
income participants. Yet these are the individuals most in
need of lifetime income in retirement. Therefore, we
suggest that serious consideration be given to the concept
of establishing a government sponsored program, ideally
administered by the PBGC where participants with low
account balances could purchase low cost annuities.
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#19New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:48:00
@jonnythan Said

Oh, here's the full transcript from that day:

https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/1210-AB33-09142010.pdf

You will notice Miss Davis' remarks differ from the written response submitted. If you read the remarks she gave in person, she "demanded" nothing.

Here is the complete excerpt of the offending portion where she "demanded" that the Obama administration apparently end all private retirement saving. Read the passage and tell me if that's what you would have concluded reading this on your own without the NSC telling you what to think:


We would support a requirement that all
defined contribution plans offer basic lifetime income
option as an optional form of benefit distribution from the
plan. A basic offering would be a simple annuity base,
transparent and subject to the joint and survivor rules
applicable to defined benefit plans. There should also be
an option for partial annuitization to give participants
greater flexibility and also to calm the nerves of those
who balk at putting all their nest egg in one basket.
Additionally, the mere existence of the benefit option
within the plan carries with it an endorsement effect that
could encourage some wavering participants to opt for an
annuity. Under current 401k plan structure, participants may
withdraw all or part of their savings -- excuse me -- and
purchase an annuity on the private market. Alternatively,
a small number of individual account plans through service
providers, offer participants annuity options. Private
annuities are problematic, primarily because of their high
cost and the negligible monthly benefits that small account
balances can purchase. For these reasons, an annuity
option within a 401k for participants with low balances
would not be a realistic choice for most low and moderate
income participants. Yet these are the individuals most in
need of lifetime income in retirement. Therefore, we
suggest that serious consideration be given to the concept
of establishing a government sponsored program, ideally
administered by the PBGC where participants with low
account balances could purchase low cost annuities.



Um Yesssssssssssss>>>>

For these reasons, an annuity
option within a 401k for participants with low balances
would not be a realistic choice for most low and moderateincome participants. Yet these are the individuals most in
need of lifetime income in retirement. Therefore, we
suggest that serious consideration be given to the concept
of establishing a government sponsored program, ideally
administered by the PBGC where participants with low
account balances could purchase low cost annuities.

Right here in front of your eyes.

Thats exactly what they are talking about. It will end up like social security, you know we pay in, they spend it on other stuff and now its bankrupt.

Seems like to me they are trying to save thier asses with the failed SSIplan by going arund the back door to the pension plans and creating another SSI plan, under a diff name. all the same. More GOV power.
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#20New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:49:43
@El_Tino Said

I wish you would, along with every other right winger, that way the other lefties can get better prices when we buy stocks. Feel free to jump back in and drive prices back up when I retire.



who are you kidding. Thats not the plan. Tha plan is we are all gong to be finally equal, equally POOR
El_Tino On October 12, 2023
booyaka!





Albuquerque, New Mexico
#21New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:50:55
@Alkaia Said

who are you kidding. Thats not the plan. Tha plan is we are all gong to be finally equal, equally POOR


Mine was a statement of fact about how the stock market works. If you don't understand how it works, perhaps you shouldn't be investing in it, no?
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#22New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:51:01
@Alkaia Said

Um Yesssssssssssss>>>>

For these reasons, an annuity
option within a 401k for participants with low balances
would not be a realistic choice for most low and moderateincome participants. Yet these are the individuals most in
need of lifetime income in retirement. Therefore, we
suggest that serious consideration be given to the concept
of establishing a government sponsored program, ideally
administered by the PBGC where participants with low
account balances could purchase low cost annuities.

Right here in front of your eyes.

Thats exactly what they are talking about. It will end up like social security, you know we pay in, they spend it on other stuff and now its bankrupt.

Seems like to me they are trying to save thier asses with the failed SSIplan by going arund the back door to the pension plans and creating another SSI plan, under a diff name. all the same. More GOV power.


She says nothing about eliminating 401ks. She is specifically recommending a way to help low-income workers save for retirement because 401ks don't work well for them.

And what about the other 40-something people who testified during the hearing? Did you read all 300+ pages of transcript already? Or are you just going to assume that this misinterpretation of a single paragraph from a single woman who testified on a single day in 2010 in the midst of a hearing that involved dozens of people is actually Obama's secret plan?
LuckyCharms On July 31, 2021
Magically Delicious





,
#23New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:52:34
So a woman petitioning a meeting is the same thing as "Obama going after your" retirement?


If we wanted to be equally poor we could work at Wal-Mart.
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#24New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:56:54
Say it with me, Alkaia:

"OK, it's possible I overreacted at this poorly-written, unsourced article's claims."

It's OK. Don't fight it, just accept your mistake and move on.
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#25New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 21:59:17
@El_Tino Said

Mine was a statement of fact about how the stock market works. If you don't understand how it works, perhaps you shouldn't be investing in it, no?



wasnt the way I saw it.

either way, the stock market is bloated falsely now by all that fed air money.

oh and I dont invest in it myself personally, I have a broker.
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#26New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 22:00:36
@jonnythan Said

Say it with me, Alkaia:

"OK, it's possible I overreacted at this poorly-written, unsourced article's claims."

It's OK. Don't fight it, just accept your mistake and move on.





ok maybe a little. I dont trust those sunsab****es at all.

they already killed me with obamacare so I got my eye on em
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#27New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 22:03:55
@LuckyCharms Said

So a woman petitioning a meeting is the same thing as "Obama going after your" retirement?


If we wanted to be equally poor we could work at Wal-Mart.



No Lucky, my point was they even brought it up at all. Thats how things get started see, plant a little seed here, it might grow. OUr finaces are in such a mess they are going to be looking at everything to try to stop us from going over this cliff
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#28New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 22:04:55
@Alkaia Said



ok maybe a little. I dont trust those sunsab****es at all.

they already killed me with obamacare so I got my eye on em


There you go. Progress!
Alkaia On February 05, 2013

Deleted
Banned



naples, Florida
#29New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 22:06:31
@jonnythan Said

There you go. Progress!



Do I get a scrabble doodle noodle?






edit: not fair, im sure johnny put a spell on me
jonnythan On August 02, 2014
Bringer of rad mirth


Deleted



Here and there,
#30New Post! Nov 26, 2012 @ 22:07:38
@Alkaia Said

Do I get a scrabble doodle noodle?


You get a big thumbs up from me. I don't know if I can help with your noodle
Reply to Topic<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>
Pages: << · 1 2 3 4 5 · >>

1 browsing (0 members - 1 guest)

Quick Reply
Politics Forum - Some Rudeness Allowed

      
Subscribe to topic prefs

Similar Topics
    Forum Topic Last Post Replies Views
New posts   Conspiracies
Thu Sep 24, 2015 @ 23:02
54 12288
New posts   Politics
Tue Sep 13, 2016 @ 02:50
40 13260
New posts   Random
Sun Aug 01, 2010 @ 22:18
14 5920
New posts   US Elections
Tue May 07, 2024 @ 21:26
78 25549
New posts   Random
Sun Nov 19, 2017 @ 22:47
180 15720